Current affairs and opinion, diplomatic conflicts around the world

Greetings to everyone, I took the time to analyze a little how geopolitics is moving right now, what changes it can bring to the global economy and to the global peace.

Let's start with the conflict between South Africa and Croatia, what happened from my point of view?

-. Croatia has become an active country, with a vibrant community, full of new players, and with the return of some of its players from abroad. So far, so good. But Like any large country, it needs to expand and the situation in Europe is complicated. There isn't much room to expand and it's better to have your neighbors as allies than enemies. That's where Croatia begins to see South African with a thirst for blood.

The war happens, Croatia achieves its goal, conquers South Africa, South Africa counted on the help of Australia, a small community also but active in the game, And here I personally think is where the beginning of the breakdown of relations with many neutral countries towards Croatia, Croatia decided to nuclearly attack a small country, which at the time was not a threat to them. This demonstrated the belligerence of its leaders. Now the tables have turned, From that moment on, Sweden began to view Croatia with bloodlust. 

The NAP between South Africa and Croatia takes place, which for many was a forced NAP, since South Africa was left with only one region, making it impossible for active players from South Africa to produce supplies, and count on the motivation of more players, such as the former CP of South Africa who went into exile and requested political asylum in the USA. The biggest winner of this was Croatia, who truly deserved their victory as they won in battle.

Now changing events, comes the liberation of Albania led by South Korea and Croatia against MKD becoming a 1vs5, Injustice or justice, that's up to each person. For me, the ALB-MKD conflict is a personal one between its leaders. But I think this is where Croatia and its allies' second mistake comes in, If you've just emerged from a conflict, don't rush into another one too quickly. Others will take advantage of your exhaustion and do what they want. All the top countries have made big mistakes at one time or another, And they have paid dearly for it.

Now, after the bfte-epic conflict, we had not had a large-scale conflict, which apparently is what can start here, could it become a WW3? Personally, I doubt it. I'll go with the statistics. 

On the WET+Mkd side we have an active population of 197 players

On the Croatian side we have an active population of 195 players (it is worth noting that countries in current conflict with WET, Italy, Bosnia and Hungary, have been placed here)

Is it enough to become a global conflict? So far, no. eClesiar currently has an active population of 863 players, To become a WW3 It would need to go from more than 432 active players within the conflict and currently the conflict has a total of 392 acti players.

Honestly, we don't know what this game has in store for us in the coming days. It could be the start of something big, or it could remain a mere verbal conflict. 

All the information reported here is my personal opinion from my perspective. If you have a different perspective, that's also valid.

V+C+S