Economics
Comments (12)
Bokoman
Good article we do need another with more details and may be an interview from the leader of each alliance.
Vote
Reply
15-08-2025
2 Votes
Voted by:
Hazyouthere
replied to Bokoman
I was planning on that, but with all the other articles that have been posted since the beginning of this conflict, I didnt want to repeat what everyone has already heard. Instead, I combined all the info I got from Government and Citizens alike to make this article. As much as I would love to talk to every Leader, most do not answer or want me to spread their reasons. And now that I've gone off the rails of not picking a side, i dont see myself getting anymore continued talks unless its with people/leaders who actually want peace. Which is what I want anyways so its kind of what I wanted anyways...
Vote
15-08-2025
1
Voted by:
Majestic Doggo
A completely delusional article that is far from reality nice propaganda
Vote
Reply
14-08-2025
0 Votes
Hazyouthere
replied to Majestic Doggo
Would you like to explain your thoughts then?
Vote
14-08-2025
0
Majestic Doggo
replied to Majestic Doggo
This war arose following EPIC's massive absorption which upset the balance of power EPIC in its dreams of grandeur saw things too optimistically and declared war on us in anger because they didn't accept that we were rebalancing the powers
As France we have always been against becoming an overpowering bloc that was basically the goal of WET but it must be said that EPIC's ambition has never stopped growing
France is a small community we don't even have 15 active players we aren't subject to anyone the problem with this game is the massive ambition of certain players who think they are invincible because they are boosted by all the people they are supposed to protect
It's up to you not to accept the role of the submissive
The basis of geopolitics is to create connections and figure out how to get by
If you don't want to play the game give up on the idea of having a country and join a larger player base as many already do
To come back to the fact that countries are being wiped out that's the game
France has experienced two periods of total hype including a rather long occupation but we don't behave like victims
We don't cry because we've lost buildings
we get back up we resist we forge bonds and we turn the situation around
I'll let you ask my former enemies who have become my most loyal allies
Vote
15-08-2025
1
Voted by:
Hazyouthere
replied to Majestic Doggo
Thank you for the reply. I dont spread propaganda and im sorry you see it that way. I tell it through the eyes of citizens no matter where they are in the world. Yes, I get some info from Government officials, but I do not glorify any 1 side. I intentionally did not dive into the intricacies because there has been many articles on the subject. I was simply stating that there is a way bigger picture where WET and EPIC are planning on taking over the entire world and these Alliances are going to destroy the smaller Nations who are wasting all their resources in an attempt to have a seat within these Alliances. But will only result in them being too weak to defend themselves from those same Alliances who promised them independence/co-op. It doesnt matter what side is chosen, or if you stay neutral and watch. I agree with your reply, but both sides are pushing this agenda regardless of who decided to throw the first punch. This war was inevitable but at what cost other than to divide us further from what I say, and you've said in this reply. "Unity" that is what I stand for. Not a major power. Thank you again and id love to continue talks with you in hopes we can all find this peace.
Vote
15-08-2025
0
simme
Well said and well written!
Vote
Reply
14-08-2025
1 Votes
Voted by:
swiatlo
Nice that article is premium content free!
Vote
Reply
14-08-2025
4 Votes
Voted by:
sw_popka
This war happened beacuse of EPIC's rapid expansion and obvious goals of conquering the world.
Vote
Reply
14-08-2025
1 Votes
Voted by:
Hazyouthere
replied to sw_popka
Both sides are doing the same thing.
Vote
14-08-2025
0
Deleted
The winners write history and will decide who broke the NAP first
Vote
Reply
14-08-2025
0 Votes
PoIand
u keep saying both sides wanted it. Please dont rewrite history without checking the facts. Theres 4 independent sides not 2, EPIC hasnt interfered globally, got their colonies by merging societies, ofc some multi trolls r now created by the enemy for the war. Infact EPIC was created precisely cuz the rest were world policing & humiliating peace-lovers. The war was started by sweden who coveted it for a long time
Vote
Reply
14-08-2025
0 Votes
PoIand
replied to PoIand
ranking desired war targets, then talking about abolishing NAP between OTHER countries, and finally installing a puppet to do it. Im a 2click individual too but i read the news and remember them ;) In short most of EPIC`s enemies are egomaniacs who since the start of the game have consistently wanted things to be run their way and keep starting wars to get it, then screech when shown the mirror
Vote
14-08-2025
0
Zhaturin
replied to PoIand
"started by Sweden" :'D nice troll
Vote
14-08-2025
1
Voted by:
PoIand
replied to PoIand
ironic coming from more swedes that went to poland to install their puppet, atleast find a real swede to comment
Vote
14-08-2025
0
Zhaturin
replied to PoIand
Bro, they had 600 energy when i went there. It was worth burning 100 meds against you.
Whatever you tell urself to sleep bro, it's the same irl yeah? Ukraine started the war with russia, because they had something Russia wanted. THis is litterally ur logic right now. Whoever starts the war isn't the aggressor in ur mind.
Vote
14-08-2025
3
Voted by:
PoIand
replied to PoIand
dont play dumb cuz i know you dont have reading comprehension issues, im too lazy to pull up articles from pursche or whoever was writting them.
Vote
14-08-2025
0
Zhaturin
replied to PoIand
You mean the anti-communist movement the CP started? What does that have to do with world-policing? You don't want free-trade in a peace loving country? Tbh i voted NO on the motion of making free-trade a human right. You're aware that world policing is when you interfere in others wars just to fuck with them? EPIC is the new BFTE, just keep on growing ur "peace empire" by hegemony.
Vote
14-08-2025
2
Voted by:
Zhaturin
replied to PoIand
Also didn't u guys do the same thing i did with moving countries to hit during ur war with epic, due to energy diff?
Vote
14-08-2025
1
Voted by:
PoIand
replied to PoIand
> ranking saudi the highest score in wanting to invade it
> talking about abolishing NAP between 2 countries that dont concern you
> installing puppet to finalize it
and an your cp having a track record of picking up fights just cuz he wants to
https://i.imgur.com/0yKfDkO.png
you are willingly playing dumb so theres no point to continue discussion with trolls bye
Vote
14-08-2025
0
Zhaturin
replied to PoIand
The list isn't a "invade list". It's a list of people the CP wanted to change to free-markets. You can do this diplomatically or by force. Did Sweden attack Saudi even if they were on the list? No. Mevek is no a puppet, he's polish irl and started to play with E-Sweden due to previous connections with Swedish citizens playing in poland from w/e game they came from. Mevek decided to move to E-Poland because the community was growing and he wanted to be a part of it (Which is hard if you're in another country). Tbh, you guys bullied the old CP of Poland into a retarded NAP. And if people tell you that it's dumb, it's probably dumb.
Vote
14-08-2025
2
Voted by:
PoIand
replied to PoIand
who is this "you guys" stop lumping me with the rest of saudis when im not even on their server post-daqako. Thats a nice internal story for your circle, the cold facts remain for everyone else to interpret. If people tell you to jump off of a bridge im sure you`ll be halfway down already
Vote
14-08-2025
0
Zhaturin
replied to PoIand
Well, "you guys" in this case would be Epic, which i thought u were advocating for. And who's the one delulu-ing about "trolling" now? Theres no point to continue discussion with trolls bye.
Vote
14-08-2025
0
PoIand
replied to PoIand
if by advocating you mean pointing out facts that dont fit your narrative then sure, guilty as charged. You came in swinging at me but left with the “bye.” Thats all the confirmation I needed
Vote
14-08-2025
0
Zhaturin
replied to PoIand
You're the one who's actually trolling, there is a big difference between out arguments. I use sarcasm and you use analogies like "you'd jump of a bridge", "find a real swed to comment" etc. If you want a proper discussion, then drop your bullshit :') Im actually telling u a story while you're just all about bullshit. It's fine though. We can't all have good things.
Vote
14-08-2025
0
PoIand
replied to PoIand
rolf your replies are just stories, ignoring the actual facts. Same pattern every time with your side, endless going round and round in circles and nothing ever gets achieved. Pure kindergarten level. This attitude will thwart every new community that might come to play. Thank you for confirming everything tho, telling stories and telling other countries how to run their market and how to play ?
Vote
14-08-2025
0
simme
replied to PoIand
I agree trendo, Sweden went TOO FAR by doing some political roleplaying in a political roleplaying game...
Vote
14-08-2025
0
PoIand
replied to PoIand
oh glad you agree simme because when "some political roleplaying" means installing puppets, scrapping agreements, and dragging in new players to carry out and bare their sins, yeah, thats going too far in any game. Thanks for saying it out loud
Vote
14-08-2025
0
simme
replied to PoIand
Good thing none of that has been happening then.
Vote
14-08-2025
0
PoIand
replied to PoIand
careful now, the more you deny reality the more you sound like one of those "peace through conquest" history books, projecting your world domination delusions of grandiose onto EPIC
Vote
14-08-2025
0
simme
replied to PoIand
Not sure who you're arguing against, but sure keep making up scenarios and blaming us for them.
"Telling other countries how to play" or creating political tension in a game about politics? What better way for conflict to arise than by political differences?
Vote
14-08-2025
0
PoIand
replied to PoIand
ah yes, "political differences" the same excuse used every time reality bites. Convenient how EPIC`s meddling magically becomes your teaching moment not your own overreach
Vote
14-08-2025
0
simme
replied to PoIand
Ok I have no idea what you are even trying to say. Reach out on discord if you have an actual argument, right now you just seem salty.
The abolish slavery thing was absolutely a way to use political difference between countries to create some much-needed action. I'm glad something's happening now, and I assumed you would be too since EPIC started the war
Vote
14-08-2025
0
PoIand
replied to PoIand
while you and your bf have been backpedaling, deflecting, and gaslighting you’ve already confirmed sweden’s sins that triggered EPIC`s preemtive strike. Look, im a nice guy, i can sponsor you a BDSM session, you dont have to keep coming back here to beg, just give me an account number already
Vote
14-08-2025
0
Hazyouthere
replied to PoIand
As much as i appreciate everyone's perspectives, this reply section is kind of missing the whole point of the article. Im not rewriting history. I purposely didnt go into detail on the who did what first because it doesnt matter. This is 2 major power alliances colliding to reduce structure and resources so one doesnt outweigh the other. It doesnt matter what side youre on...
Vote
14-08-2025
1
Voted by:
Hazyouthere
replied to PoIand
But if you go forward with the BDSM, let me know
Vote
14-08-2025
1
Voted by:
PoIand
replied to PoIand
no you kept saying both sides wanted it when in fact only 1 country has been gurgling on the thought of starting war, once it starts ofc both sides will fight to extinction. Meaningless war cant reach meaningful peace
Vote
14-08-2025
0
Hazyouthere
replied to PoIand
I understand what youre saying. But everyone knows that there has been a rivalry for the longest time and we've all been waiting for someone to throw the "first punch" which is why I said both sides wanted this to happen. It was just a matter of time before someone would start the fight.
Vote
14-08-2025
0
PoIand
replied to PoIand
thats the thing, theres been no rivalry, just self-projected delusions from some frustrated guys who cant even fight their own battles
Vote
14-08-2025
0
TheIlluminated
This article doesn’t tell the whole truth, at least for the Portuguese side.
Portugal got nuked , that’s why they sent nukes back . More important , Portugal helped USA in a lot of ways and supported them in a lot of wars!!! Basically they forgot all their history and nuked a nation that even in other bloc they had a good relationship…. I lost all the respect I had for states ?♂️
Vote
Reply
14-08-2025
8 Votes
Voted by:
+3 more
+3 more
Sosa Sosta
replied to TheIlluminated
I appreciate Portugal help back in the day, and it's unfortunate we ended up on a different sides, it's nothing personal, it's just a game, and we must win, good luck in the war until we sign a NAP
Vote
14-08-2025
1
Voted by:
Hazyouthere
replied to TheIlluminated
I didnt dive deep into who did what first because everyone has been making articles about this whole issue for awhile now. I summed it up to "Along with others on all sides."
Vote
14-08-2025
1
Voted by:
Dimi of Greece
W article saying all the truth
Vote
Reply
14-08-2025
1 Votes
Voted by:
Hazyouthere
I understand that this is an rp tactic to get those bored into some action, but its deeper than that. This is a way to silently kill off smaller Nations and bring the bigger Nations back to basics in equal terms. We're reducing resources on all sides to make each other weak and need to rebuild because we're scared if we all get too big we will be outmatched.
Vote
Reply
14-08-2025
0 Votes
Hazyouthere
The main reason for the war is to go after Sweden and Poland. The rp doesnt matter when it comes to everyone wasting everything they have for it.
Vote
Reply
14-08-2025
0 Votes
Shinji Hirako-The Owaranai Yume
replied to Hazyouthere
In fact I advised the CP of Saudi to ask Pursche from Sweden for a NAP... Sweden refused that so Epic started a war against Sweden wich was sreaming that is getting borred... and is sick from NAP
Vote
14-08-2025
2
Voted by:
Hazyouthere
replied to Hazyouthere
Like I said, this was planned on both sides. They wanted this whether it's for rp or invasions. Both sides want to diminish what resources they have on each other. But in the end, everyone returns to basics and begs for funds to continue the madness
Vote
14-08-2025
0
Zhaturin
replied to Hazyouthere
@shinji no one in their right mind naps without a war. Especially if u only want to NAP Sweden when Sweden is in an alliance. LOL.
Vote
14-08-2025
1
Voted by:
simme
replied to Hazyouthere
Shinji: the world doesn't need more useless NAPs, so I'm glad to hear such a stupid NAP was rejected
Vote
14-08-2025
0
Nuradeen
The main reason of the war is basically to make the game fun. All these yelling at each others are just role playing to make the game more exciting.
Vote
Reply
14-08-2025
2 Votes
Voted by:
Zolix777
replied to Nuradeen
I'd only argue that the toxicity from some are real sadly, not only part of the rp.
Vote
14-08-2025
2
Voted by:
Hazyouthere
replied to Nuradeen
As much as I love Nuradeen News, the main issue isn't just rp or "breaking NAP"
Its the fact we want to go to war, but not gain anything from it. We lose so much from these wars and end up broke and begging for supplies on all sides. Just to lose everything we're supposed to fight for. Why not spend our resources on making our Nations stronger rather than create a major divide in Coalitions that will crumble apon themselves once the dust settles? Love your work Nuradeen, but there is a lot going on under the table.
Vote
14-08-2025
0
